Al igual que en todo conflicto surgen las síntesis superadoras to the conflicting positions. This is my vision, not the search for sensationalism, or a cowardly position mediera. Is that in relation to heart that our country is taking place, I can not give the right total or some or other.
On the one hand the government should become co-participation taxes, the deductions he draws from the agricultural industry. Because without this, the money goes to black holes, which only contribute to sustaining heavy loss in political structures. It must also differentiate between small and large producers, I speak as a man who came from a family of field as the first work against the climate and an industry price gouging absorbed by giants. Is not the same one that has 500 or 1000 acres with million dollar productions, art machinery and insurance against weather contingencies, that he who produces a wicker hat and prayers. Why do not you can be in times of crisis to assist the giants, and in times of plenty, arresting them all equally. Moreover, the state should assist the growth of the latter to enable them to advance along the production process, the giants do what they want!, Join the small and process the produce.
On the other hand, the field, who our president called the squad full of arrogance of wealth, should not forget the bad years, where the state attended, and must not lose sight of the rest of the people, we are not only hostages, as they always say as a crutch, if we are at the forefront of the battlefield. This type of soy and agricultural change has left below the poverty line for millions of Argentines, and even today as a country is making efforts to keep exports competitive. The short-term speculative monoculture is destroying both soils, such as economies, and which brings about shortages and inflation, while trying to export anything and everything that occurs.
I have nothing against the fleet of the protesters or their handkerchiefs nostalgic oligarchy, is simply that like the government, they too are from Argentina and his first duty is to their country, they must also answer, not a relationship of repressive parents have children of conflict, is a relationship of peers, Argentina.
The output is not politics of the moment, there are contingency policy is not trying to fill the coffers of one, and choke, in abundance, neither the government nor the field. In the tug and the brawl at the fruit, we may end up plucking and killing the goose that lays golden eggs. And there are all going to end up in tears the death.
0 comments:
Post a Comment